A certain Mr Sunil Shibad is currently going around claiming that I mocked the Mumbai train blasts. Sunil is justifiably upset about recent events related to Internet censorship, but chose to hold responsible Mr N R Narayana Murthy of Infosys, then went on to lampoon, progressively, Mr Murthy, NASSCOM, the IT industry, and all “cyber coolies”. He topped off by stating that anyone who was not in Mumbai during the train blasts shouldn’t be speaking about the blog ban — which was the topic until he diverted from it. Don’t believe me? Read his own words.

When I (sarcastically) pointed out that he was abusing the memory of a terrible event for his own selfish ends, he turned it around to claim I was mocking the blasts. Who’s being more offensive? Judge for yourself.

Update: It appears Mr Sunil Shibad is of a far deeper personality than I had accounted for. The publications he set on my case were all fake.

BlogSpot isn’t the only one to fall. According to this article in the Hindu BusinessLine, The ISP Association of India is urging DoT to ban Skype and related voice messengers:

In a letter to the DoT, the Internet Service Providers Association of India (ISPAI) said: "Internet telephony services can be offered in India either by an ISP specifically permitted to do so or by a unified access service licensee. However, several service providers such as Skype, Net2Phone, Yahoo, and MSN, are providing Internet telephony services to people in India. Most of these foreign service providers do offer termination in Indian fixed-line telephones as well."

The letter, sent on July 13, also said that these service providers do not possess the requisite licence as mandated by the Government of India, thus vitiating the level playing field for bona fide licensees, such as Indian ISPs.

…

The Indian ISPs have pointed to a recent ban imposed on Skype by the South Korean Government for offering voice service without a licence.

The ISPs also said that the service could prove to be a threat to national security with no monitoring being done.

Here comes the “threat to national security” bogeyman again.

Om Malik is upset that the Indian blog ban is getting more attention than the Indian train bombings. Nishant and I beg to differ. It is perfectly natural that bloggers are more concerned about themselves than about a distant event. If you sat in a Mumbai train and listened to the conversation, we bet they’ll be talking about the bombings, not blogs.

If bloggers were talking about the bombings without either first-hand experience or new insight, that is when you should be calling them pretentious. The fallacy is in assuming that bloggers or the blogosphere have a greater purpose than navel-gazing.

It appears India’s Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has issued a directive to Indian ISPs to block BlogSpot and TypePad, and several ISPs have complied. LiveJournal is spared. I’ve been unable to access BlogSpot since Friday — the connection times out.

Here are reports from Mridula Dwivedi and Neha Viswanathan, and on DesiPundit. There’s a new Bloggers Collective group for tracking updates. Shivam Vij is currently working the phone with ISPs and government departments and so far has confirmation that this blockage was not ordered by CERT-IN, the only body authorised to issue orders to ISPs under the IT Act 2003. The order came from DoT on Friday (CERT-IN is required to route orders via DoT) and the list of sites being blocked is not public. Shivam’s asked for the list but been told it is “highly confidential”.

I’ll post updates as they become available.

Update: Shivam Vij managed to get through to DoT official Dr Gulshan Rai, who it appears is also director of CERT-IN. His response: “Somebody must have asked for some sites to be blocked. What is your problem?” Please tell him what your problem is. According to the directory, his phone number is +91 (11) 2436 3081. Email. Nandan Babla’s posted a guide to filing a Right to Information (RTI) application (bypass block).

There’s a wiki page now for reporting ISPs that are participating in the block. If you can’t access BlogSpot, please report your ISP.

Update 2: GeoCities is also blocked. Dina Mehta has her take on the situation. Amit Agarwal has a collection of tips on how to bypass the block (but first you’ll have to bypass the block to read that). Shivam Vij now has a longer write-up on the information he dug up this morning.

Update 3 – 5:15 PM: Airtel (and possibly) Sify have also started blocking.

Update 4 – 10:55 PM: Sify and Tata Indicom (previously VSNL) are also confirmed blocking now. Shivam Vij has an article out at Rediff. Boing Boing’s carrying links (hello BB readers!) too. That should get the word out a bit. Others on the Bloggers Collective group have been pursuing journalists at various publications.

I had a late evening meeting with the technical head of a large, non-consumer ISP. It was work related, so I can’t reveal who until appropriate. He confirmed that DoT has a regular practice of sending a list of URLs to be blocked, and that it is illegal for an ISP to block anything other than this list. Since it comes from a government department, the list is not confidential. I hope to have my hands on it shortly.

Neha’s collecting other updates, by far the most comprehensive yet.

Update 5 – July 18, 12:15 PM: Mainstream media is picking up the story. There’s a list on the wiki. Far too much noise on Bloggers Collective group about how censorship can be routed around via proxies. Get this, folks. This isn’t about censoring bloggers. This is about curtailment of civil rights of all internet users. That is what we should be fighting against.

Update 6 – 5:15 PM: The group is now getting extremely noisy. 235 members and 570 messages, in just two days. I wrote a piece for the Times on how to circumvent mistaken censorship. If it clears the editors, it’ll hopefully be in print tomorrow. Getting around the block is easy, but we need people to be aware of how. Nishant Shah offers the thought that maybe the government ordered this block knowing fully well that it could be circumvented. Their point is made, anyway.

Update 7 – July 19, 9:50 AM: So much going on now, I’ve stopped keeping track. Neha’s not. This is taking way too much time away from other priorities. As should be clear by now, the government has not decided to block blogs. This is a case of mass ISP incompetence (or intentional goof so as to raise awareness, the conspiracy theorist in me wants to believe). My article made it to several editions of the Times of India, even making front page in the Hyderabad edition. I haven’t seen it yet. It’s not in the online edition and ePaper isn’t working for me just now. Kamla Bhatt did a podcast on the affair last night. Amit Agarwal, Neha Viswanathan, Suresh Ramasubramanian and I were interviewed.

Update 8 – 3:30 PM: My article appeared in the Times of India in Hyderabad (front page!), Bangalore (page 9), Mumbai (page 12), Delhi (page 15) and Lucknow (page 11). Because each edition was differently edited depending on space constraints, here is the full length version.

Update 9 – 8:40 PM: The Indian Consulate in NYC has offered an explanation:

From: A.R.Ghanashyam <dcg@[snip]>

A two-page write up containing extremely derogatory references to Islam and the holy prophet which had the potential to inflame religious sensitivities in India and create serious law and order problems in the country appeared in a blog facilitated by well known search engines. The matter was immediately taken note of by our CERT (Computer Emergency Response Team) and the Department of Telecommunications (DOT) was informed of it. The DOT took up the matter forthwith with the search engines and instructions were also issued to all Internet providers to block the two impertinent pages. Because of a technological error, the Internet providers went beyond what was expected of them which in turn resulted in the unfortunate blocking of all blogs. Department of Telecommunications have now clarified the issue and the error is being rectified and it is expected that normalcy in respect of blogs will soon be restored.

Update 10 – 11:05 PM: Shivam Vij calls the bluff. None of the blocked sites appear to have anything to do with threatening the national interest.

HinduUnity.org and HinduHumanRights.org are among 17 sites sought to be blocked, on the grounds that they are spreading Hindu nationalist propaganda. Accessed through an anonymizer, HinduUnity.org was found to have articles against Congress party President Sonia Gandhi and Indian Muslims. It also had a ‘hit list’ of people it considered anti-Hindu.

Another site on the list is Rahulyadav.com, set up by a US-based person who calls himself a member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad. Dalitstan.org, on the other hand, calls itself a ‘human rights organisation working for the upliftment of Dalits.’

None of the sites seem to possess any direct security threat to India, or have any connection with the recent Mumbai blasts. Even more bizarre are the blogs sought to be blocked. ‘Princess Kimberley’ is a defunct blog with just two postings in 2004 about an American teenager’s depressing life. ‘Commonfolk Commonsense’ is a Chinese language blog, while 'Exposing the Left' is written by someone in Southern Illinois!

CNN-IBN covered the issue in a news segment at 10 PM. Peter Griffin posted a scan of a fax of the order asking for the sites to be blocked:

1. http://www.hinduunity.org
2. http://mypetjawa.mu.nu
3. http://pajamaeditors.blogspot.com
4. http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com
5. http://thepiratescove.us
6. http://commonfolkcommonsense.blogspot.com
7. http://bamapachyderm.com
8. http://prinesskimberly.blogspot.com
9. http://merrimusings.typepad.com
10. http://mackers-world.com
11. http://dalitstan.com
12. http://hinduhumanrights.org/hindufocus.html
13. http://nndh.com (fax scan unclear, could be wrong)
14. http://bloodroyaltriped.com
15. http://imagessearchyahoo.com
16. http://imamali8.com
17. http://rahulyadav.com

Number 15 on that list, imagessearchyahoo.com, is a typo for image.search.yahoo.com, Yahoo!’s image search site. The typo domain is also owned by Yahoo!. Searching for images via a typo of the domain name is against the national interest? I’d love to see how the government justifies this one.

Update 11 – July 20, 8:15 AM: Gopal Sankaranarayan, a lawyer, is upset that if the block is being lifted as reported, it will kill the momentum to file a PIL to ensure such blocks do not happen again. He’s right. It’s not just the petition, but any form of coordination against this sort of thing happening again. (More.)

Update 12 – 9:00 PM: DoT now says ISPs are at fault for blocking more than necessary and demands an explanation. ISPAI in return tells DoT that blocking has practical constraints. Full story. DoT also claims the order to block came from the Department of Information Technology (DIT). DoT secretary D S Mathur says “DoT is the licensor and the controlling agency for ISPs, and when we get a request from DIT to block sites, we have to act accordingly.”

Update 13 – 11:30 PM: Arka Mukhopadhyay is mailing public intellectuals to register their protest. She has confirmation from Dr U R Ananthamurthy (bypass block). This is a novel method, one that hadn’t occurred to me before. For it to be effective, however, we must take their voices beyond blogs, into public consciousness. I should note here that the bypass link this time is via pkblogs.com, a resource set up by Pakistani bloggers when fighting censorship in their country and now usable in India too. They were gracious enough to share their code. Dr Awab Alvi, Sabahat Iqbal Ashraf (bypass) and Omer Alvie (bypass) have been fairly active helping out with the Indian blockade.

Update 14 – July 22, 11:30 PM: Just a notice that I’m no longer adding to this post. Updates will be in new posts henceforth.

A sticky attention economy is inherently biased towards acquiring new subscribers than keeping existing ones happy. Witness cell phone providers falling over themselves to provide incentives to new users, while they think nothing of ripping off existing ones. Witness web service providers getting excited over new services, while ignoring the flaws in existing ones.

It’s in the nature of the system. Getting the attention of new subscribers is hard, so extra effort must be made there. The attention’s sticky however, so once you have them, you can afford to ignore them. They won’t go away unless really pissed.

Now if only there was a way to demand attention, a way that is obvious enough to enough people for their collective dissent to blip loud. A Petition Online where you don’t have to invite people to sign your petition because they’re all writing their own. Where you don’t even have to bother writing one — because you didn’t think it was significant enough — but one gets put together anyway. Nothing I’ve seen quite does it. They’re trying. For whoever can build and get subscribers to such a framework, there’s a fortune to be made.

Last evening I went to the Blank Noise tea party in Malleswaram.

I first come across Blank Noise at Jasmeen Patheja’s graduation exhibition at Srishti in Jan 2004. The impression then was of distinct hostility. The campaign was against eve-teasing, or specifically, sexual harassment of women by men. I was male (heck, I still am). Was I one of the targets of the campaign? Jasmeen is an attractive woman. One look is all you’d need to want to invite her out to coffee. I admit, I wanted to. And yet, there she was in her basement setup, surrounded by exhibits that amounted to saying I would be precisely the kind of person she was targeting if I dared make a move. It was scary. How was I supposed to sympathise with her cause when a Potential Offender label hung overhead?

I came away uneasy.

Jasmeen’s kept at her project beyond gradution, gathered a team of volunteers, indulged in direct action activism, made leaders out of her team (hi Chinmayee, Hemangini), spawned initiatives in other cities, and — if you will recall the Blank Noise Blogathon a few months ago — has created a fairly remarkable initiative. It may not be a household name yet, but it’s not obscure either.

All the while, my reservations remained. The entire approach seemed superficial, like a knee-jerk reaction, attacking the symptoms instead of the cause. How many offenders would you have to scald before you ran out of them? How long could her volunteers fuel the fire?

I met Jasmeen again at a party late last year. There would have been no reason for her to remember me but for that we were both on the Sarai Independent Fellowship last year. I had been studying the effects of user interface design on community formation. She wanted help with her blog and forthcoming website.

For various reasons, we didn’t follow up until this March when Nishant and I finally met her. We had been working on conceptualising community oriented sites (including two ongoing projects) and had some insights that we thought would be useful to her. My unease had since been tempered by a realisation of the pressing need for what she was doing. I’ve been “eve-teased” myself. I used to have chest-length hair a few years ago. When wearing a helmet, I could easily pass for a girl. Boys on bikes would regularly overtake me to turn around and peer into my visor. Sometimes recognition and shock would register. These irritating incidents made me realise what the other half must regularly experience in a world that’s perfectly normal to my XY-type. It has been a growing awareness since.

I’m also given to understand now that my reservations weren’t unique. Her team is aware of the criticisms to their approach and seeking to transcend to dealing with the causes, but for one little problem: nobody really knows what the causes are. Sure, you and I can argue all we want about how one cultural factor or the other is responsible, but unless it is careful research that has survived scrutiny and debate, we’ll just argue endlessly. It’ll take generations for attitude changes to propagate down to our children’s upbringing, while women continue to get harassed on our streets. Blank Noise has a need to deal with the problem now. Worrying about effectiveness and deeper change comes after.

As Yashas Chandra put it at the gathering yesterday, they’re hacking society’s attitudes, one little bit at a time. Power to them. As for the revamped website, that must unfortunately wait for funding.

In April, I attended the Fireflies Festival of Sacred Music and took a bunch of pictures. Fireflies resident Anugraha John approached me to say he had seen my earlier pictures and liked them, and would like to use this set for event publicity. Several of the performers also asked if they could have pictures. I gave them copies and uploaded a few. Another fireflies resident Saju V wrote an article for the Deccan Herald and some of my pictures got included.

The next month, the festival’s co-organisers Guruskool Music mailed to ask if I could cover Sunday Jam, their monthly concert for upcoming bands. I did. When I handed them the pictures, Geetha Navale surprised me with a cheque for my efforts. It wasn’t much (Rs 750) and I won’t be getting rich off such gigs, but it was very sweet of them. Then the Deccan Herald sent a cheque too (Rs 500) for the pictures they published.

I couldn’t make it to Sunday Jam in June, but Silvester Divas did. Silvester’s been making incredible pictures despite having a DSLR only a few months. He has an enthusiasm for exploring his equipment’s capabilities that I no longer do. From what I heard, he liked Sunday Jam.

This July, neither of us could make it, which is quite unfortunate. If there’s one thing I’ve learnt from these gigs, it’s that upcoming artists want to be photographed performing. They’re happy to have a lens pointing at them. And amateur photographers want subjects to practise with. There’s only so much inspiration you can get running around with a camera and shooting everything on the street. Unfortunately, I couldn’t think of anyone else to ask.

It’s almost like there’s a need for a forum facilitating this sort of linking up. I propose we make one. Let’s call it the Social Photography Exchange. It could be as simple as a mailing list where photographers hang out and event organisers or performers post to ask for coverage. A website with greater load handling capabilities can come later.

What do you think?

A section of Bangalore’s Airport Road flyover will open this month, nearly three years after work began. The construction activity (or rather the visible lack of it) caused grave inconvenience to commuters in the region — and that’s an understatement. Area resident Madhu Menon has an illustrated guide to a flaw in the design that could cause bottlenecks. While I would not go as far as to characterise city planners as he does — lack of coordination more than stupidity being to blame — the inconvenience caused to commuters is very, very real.

My former editor and good friend Gulnar Joshi works in print media and specialises in giving tired magazines a makeover. She has a new blog tracking the mag scene from an Indian perspective. Check out some of her recent posts:

• The Politics of Cover Pictures: Time magazine’s recent issue on India has a different cover for the Indian edition. Link.
• 2006 Chicago Tribune Favourite 50: The staff at Chicago Tribune announced their fourth Annual ‘Favourite 50 Magazines’ list. In first place is The Economist, the only magazine I religiously read cover to cover each week. Link.
• 2 Hindi Titles from Infomedia India: Better Photography magazine now has a Hindi edition. But is there a market for such a magazine? Some commentary would have been nice. Link.